Carbon Credits Have a Double-Spend Problem. This Microsoft-Backed Project Is Trying to Fix It

The InterWork Alliance (IWA), a tech-agnostic token standardization initiative that grew out of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, is engaged on blockchain instruments to forestall the “double-spending” of carbon credit.

Carbon accounting works by permitting nations or company entities to pay for his or her carbon-emitting sins, thus making a market mechanism to drive business towards greener processes.

But there’s an issue.

Related: Indian Users Almost 5 Times More Likely to Encounter Crypto Hacking: Microsoft Report

“There’s no way right now for you to determine that a tree hasn’t been sold 100 times over,” mentioned Microsoft blockchain architect and IWA Chairman Marley Gray.

The Microsoft-backed IWA sustainability group is stepping in with a tokenization commonplace that goals to convey transparency to carbon accounting.

Read extra: Firm Uses Ethereum to Tokenize Sustainable Infrastructure in Fight Against Climate Change

Large corporations can offset their carbon emissions by taking part in and funding environmentally pleasant tasks. However, there’s a distinct lack of verified carbon-offsetting credit, mentioned Gray.

Related: Microsoft Partners With Waves Enterprise to Tokenize Industrial Assets

“There are not enough verified – verified is the key word – carbon offset credits in the world today just to satisfy Microsoft’s needs for this year,” mentioned Gray. “That was an eye-opener. Every major corporate is coming out with these big sustainability goals, so we have to do something dramatic to improve the supply of verified offsets.”

IWA’s answer

The IWA sustainability working group contains Accenture, Climate Chain Coalition, Digital Asset, Nasdaq, Neo Global Development, R3, SIX Digital Exchange (SDX), Xpansiv and others. The group will create a standardized framework for tokenization, beginning with voluntary carbon offsetting, and can then develop its focus to regulated markets within the close to future.

This is just not a brand new downside and quite a few technologists have tried to give you methods to make carbon accounting extra rigorous, including using blockchains

“You had a lot of startups go after these spaces, and everyone’s sort of building these walled gardens that don’t match the buyers’ requirements,” mentioned Gray. “So we decided to back the bus up, and get everyone to agree on what a carbon credit is, how it’s structured and how we should then tokenize that to solve our double-spend credit problem.”

Read extra: Hyperledger Conference Shows Where Blockchain Can Fight Global Warming

The time period “carbon credit” has turn into overloaded, mentioned Gray. Part of the IWA’s mission is to interrupt down the various kinds of carbon credit score for tokenization, comparable to EU-issued carbon credit traded on regulated markets. 

Carbon offsets, alternatively, may be both derived from avoiding emissions by, as an illustration, utilizing renewable power, or by eradicating emissions through tasks that plant bushes. Illustrating the issue, these two variants are measured in another way and priced in another way, mentioned Gray.

When it involves verifying carbon offsetting tasks, corporations don’t care whether or not there’s a blockchain underlying the answer, they only wish to make sure it’s trusted and transferable, Gray added.

“We have to be able to define a project so that buyers of carbon credits can find out the project details and see the provenance of that carbon credit and its worthiness,” he mentioned.

Related Stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here