Commentary: Can AI and machine studying enhance the financial system? – FreightWaves

The views expressed listed here are solely these of the creator and don’t essentially signify the views of FreightWaves or its associates.

In this installment of the AI in Supply Chain sequence (#AIinSupplyChain), I attempted to discern the outlines of a solution to the query posed within the headline above by studying three educational papers. This article distills what I take into account crucial takeaways from the papers.

Although the context of the investigations that resulted in these papers appears on the financial system as an entire, there are implications which can be relevant on the stage of a person agency. So, in case you are accountable for innovation, company improvement and technique at your organization, it’s most likely price your time to learn every of them after which interpret the findings on your personal agency.

‘Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox’ (November 2017)

In this paper, Erik Brynjolfsson, Daniel Rock and Chad Syverson discover the paradox that whereas programs utilizing synthetic intelligence are advancing quickly, measured economywide productiveness has declined.

Recent optimism about AI and machine studying is pushed by latest and dramatic enhancements in machine notion and cognition. These expertise are important to the methods by which folks get work executed. So this has fueled hopes that machines will quickly strategy and probably surpass folks of their means to do many alternative duties that at this time are the protect of people.

However, productiveness statistics don’t but replicate development that’s pushed by the advances in AI and machine studying. If something, the authors cite statistics to recommend that labor productiveness development fell in superior economies beginning within the mid-2000s and has not recovered to its earlier ranges.

Therein lies the paradox: AI and machine studying boosters predict it would remodel complete swathes of the financial system, but the financial knowledge don’t level to such a change going down. What provides?

The authors provide 4 potential explanations.

First, it’s potential that the optimism about AI and machine studying applied sciences is misplaced. Perhaps they are going to be helpful in sure slim sectors of the financial system, however finally their economywide affect might be modest and insignificant.

Second, it’s potential that the affect of AI and machine studying applied sciences will not be being measured precisely. Here it’s pessimism in regards to the significance of those applied sciences that stops society from precisely measuring their contribution to financial productiveness.

Third, maybe these new applied sciences are producing constructive returns to the financial system, BUT these advantages are being captured by a really small variety of corporations and as such the rewards are loved by solely a minuscule fraction of the inhabitants.

Fourth, the advantages of AI and machine studying won’t be mirrored within the wider financial system till investments have been made to construct up complementary applied sciences, processes, infrastructure, human capital and different varieties of property that make it potential for society to comprehend and measure the transformative advantages of AI and machine studying.

The authors argue that AI, machine studying and their complementary new applied sciences embody the traits of normal function applied sciences (GPTs). A GPT has three main options: It is pervasive or can grow to be pervasive; it may be improved upon as time elapses; and it leads on to complementary improvements.

Electricity. The inside combustion engine. Computers. The authors cite these as examples of GTPs, with which readers are acquainted.

Crucially, the authors state that “a GPT can at one moment both be present and yet not affect current productivity growth if there is a need to build a sufficiently large stock of the new capital, or if complementary types of capital, both tangible and intangible, need to be identified, produced, and put in place to fully harness the GPT’s productivity benefits.”

It takes a very long time for financial manufacturing on the macro- or micro-scale to be reorganized to accommodate and harness a brand new GPT. The authors level out that computer systems took 25 years earlier than they turned ubiquitous sufficient to have an effect on productiveness. It took 30 years for electrical energy to grow to be widespread. As the authors state, the adjustments required to harness a brand new GPT “take substantial time and resources, contributing to organizational inertia. Firms are complex systems that require an extensive web of complementary assets to allow the GPT to fully transform the system. Firms that are attempting transformation often must reevaluate and reconfigure not only their internal processes but often their supply and distribution chains as well.”

The authors finish the article by stating: “Realizing the benefits of AI is far from automatic. It will require effort and entrepreneurship to develop the needed complements, and adaptability at the individual, organizational, and societal levels to undertake the associated restructuring. Theory predicts that the winners will be those with the lowest adjustment costs and that put as many of the right complements in place as possible. This is partly a matter of good fortune, but with the right roadmap, it is also something for which they, and all of us, can prepare.”

‘Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade?’ (August 2018)

In this paper, Brynjolfsson, Xiang Hui and Meng Liu discover the impact that the introduction of eBay Machine Translation (eMT) had on eBay’s worldwide commerce. The authors describe eMT as “an in-house machine learning system that statistically learns how to translate among different languages.” They additionally state: “As a platform, eBay mediated more than 14 billion dollars of global trade among more than 200 countries in 2014.” Basically, eBay represents a great approximation of a posh financial system inside which to look at the economywide advantages of this sort of machine translation.

The authors state: “We show that a moderate quality upgrade increases exports on eBay by 17.5%. The increase in exports is larger for differentiated products, cheaper products, listings with more words in their title. Machine translation also causes a greater increase in exports to less experienced buyers. These heterogeneous treatment effects are consistent with a reduction in translation-related search costs, which comes from two sources: (1) an increased matching relevance due to improved accuracy of the search query translation and (2) better translation quality of the listing title in buyers’ language.”

They report an accompanying 13.1% improve in income, although they solely noticed a 7% improve within the human acceptance price.

They additionally state: “To put our result in context, Hui (2018) has estimated that a removal of export administrative and logistic costs increased export revenue on eBay by 12.3% in 2013, which is similar to the effect of eMT. Additionally, Lendle et al. (2016) have estimated that a 10% reduction in distance would increase trade revenue by 3.51% on eBay. This means that the introduction of eMT is equivalent of [sic] the export increase from reducing distances between countries by 37.3%. These comparisons suggest that the trade-hindering effect of language barriers is of first-order importance. Machine translation has made the world significantly smaller and more connected.”

‘The Productivity J-Curve’ (October 2018, revised January 2020)

In this paper, Brynjolfsson, Rock and Syverson develop a mannequin that reveals how GPTs like AI “enable and require significant complementary investments, including co-invention of new processes, products, business models and human capital. These complementary investments are often intangible and poorly measured in the national accounts, even when they create valuable assets for the firm” AND they “develop a model that shows how this leads to an underestimation of productivity growth in the early years of a new GPT, and how later, when the benefits of intangible investments are harvested, productivity growth will be overestimated.” Their “model generates a Productivity J-Curve that can explain the productivity slowdowns often accompanying the advent of GPTs, as well as the increase in productivity later.”

The authors discover that, first, “As firms adopt a new GPT, total factor productivity growth will initially be underestimated because capital and labor are used to accumulate unmeasured intangible capital stocks.” Then, second, “Later, measured productivity growth overestimates true productivity growth because the capital service flows from those hidden intangible stocks generates measurable output.” Finally, “The error in measured total factor productivity growth therefore follows a J-curve shape, initially dipping while the investment rate in unmeasured capital is larger than the investment rate in other types of capital, then rising as growing intangible stocks begin to contribute to measured production.”

This explains the noticed phenomenon that when a brand new expertise like AI and machine studying, or one thing like blockchain and distributed ledger expertise, is launched into an space resembling provide chain, it generates livid debate about whether or not it creates any worth for incumbent suppliers or clients.

If we take into account the reported time it took earlier than different GPTs like electrical energy and computer systems started to contribute measurably to firm-level and economywide productiveness, we should admit that it’s maybe too early to write down off blockchains and different distributed ledger applied sciences, or AI and machine studying, and their functions in sectors of the financial system that aren’t often related to web and different digital applied sciences.

Give it a while. However, I believe we’re close to the inflection level of the AI and Machine Learning Productivity J-curve. As I’ve labored on this #AIinSupplyChain sequence, I’ve grow to be extra satisfied that the businesses which can be experimenting with AI and machine studying of their provide chain operations now may have the benefit over their opponents over the subsequent decade.

I believe we’re a bit farther away from the inflection level of a Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Productivity J-Curve. I can not but make a cogent argument about why that is true, though in March 2014, I printed #ChainReaction: Who Will Own The Age of Cryptocurrencies? — a part of an ongoing try to grasp when blockchains and different distributed applied sciences would possibly grow to be extra ubiquitous than they’re now.


Examining this matter has added to my understanding of why disruption occurs. The authors of the Productivity J-Curve paper state that “the more transformative the new technology, the more likely its productivity effects will initially be underestimated.”

The lengthy length throughout which incumbent corporations underestimate the productiveness results of a comparatively new GPT is what contributes to the phenomenon studied by Rebecca Henderson and Kim Clark in “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms.” It can be described as Supply Side Disruption by Josgua Gans in his e-book, “The Disruption Dilemma,” and summarized on this March 2016 HBR article, “The Other Disruption.”

If we concentrate on AI and machine studying particularly, in an exchange on Twitter on Sept. 27, Brynjolfsson said, “The machine translation example is in many ways the exception. More often it takes a lot of organizational reinvention and time before AI breakthroughs translate into productivity gains.”

By the time entrenched and industry-leading incumbents awaken to the threats posed by newly developed GPTs, a crop of challengers who had no choice however to undertake the brand new GPT on the outset has grow to be highly effective sufficient to threaten the monetary stability of an {industry}.

One instance? E-commerce and its affect on retail normally.

If you’re an govt, what experiments are you performing to determine if and the way your organization’s provide chain operations might be made extra productive by implementing applied sciences which have to date been underestimated by you and different incumbents in your {industry}?

If you aren’t doing something but, are you fulfilling your obligations to your organization’s shareholders, workers, clients and different stakeholders?

If you’re a workforce engaged on improvements that you simply imagine have the potential to considerably refashion world provide chains, we’d love to inform your story in FreightWaves. I’m simple to achieve on LinkedIn and Twitter. Alternatively, you possibly can attain out to any member of the editorial workforce at FreightWaves at

Dig deeper into the #AIinSupplyChain Series with FreightWaves.

Commentary: Optimal Dynamics – the decision layer of logistics?

Commentary: Combine optimization, machine learning and simulation to move freight

Commentary: SmartHop brings AI to owner-operators and brokers

Commentary: Optimizing a truck fleet using artificial intelligence

Commentary: FleetOps tries to solve data fragmentation issues in trucking

Commentary: Bulgaria’s Transmetrics uses augmented intelligence to help customers

Commentary: Applying AI to decision-making in shipping and commodities markets

Commentary: The enabling technologies for the factories of the future

Commentary: The enabling technologies for the networks of the future

Commentary: Understanding the data issues that slow adoption of industrial AI

Commentary: How AI and machine learning improve supply chain visibility, shipping insurance

Commentary: How AI, machine learning are streamlining workflows in freight forwarding, customs brokerage

Author’s disclosure: I’m not an investor in any early-stage startups talked about on this article, both personally or by way of REFASHIOND Ventures. I’ve no different monetary relationship with any entities talked about on this article.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here